First- vs. Third-Person & the Editorial "We"
Who is speaking in your paper? APA has a clear answer: you are โ and you're allowed to say so. The rules here undo two myths at once: that academic writing bans "I," and that "we" is a polite stand-in for everyone.
4.16 โ Use "I" for Your Own Work
Many students were taught to never write "I" in a paper. APA says the opposite: when you describe steps you took or conclusions you drew, use the first person. Referring to yourself in the third person โ "the author," "the researcher," "this writer" โ is ambiguous (which author?) and reads as evasive.
The reader of the first version can't tell whether "the author" is you or a source you're citing. The rule in one line: first person for your work, third person for everyone else's.
4.17 โ The Editorial "We"
"We" is only correct when it refers to yourself plus your co-authors. If you wrote the paper alone, there is no "we." And "we" can never mean people in general โ that's the editorial we, and it forces readers to guess who you mean:
Who underestimates โ parents? Pediatricians? Researchers? All humans? Replace the vague "we" with the specific noun you actually mean:
| You wrote it... | Say | Never say |
|---|---|---|
| Alone | I | we, the author, this researcher |
| With co-authors | we | the authors (for yourselves) |
| About people in general | people, parents, researchers, nurses... | we, us, our |
Watch the Hidden Editorial "We"
The editorial "we" sneaks in through "our" and "us," especially in introductions and conclusions:
Practice
Question 1
You are the sole author. Which sentence follows APA 4.16?
Question 2
Which sentence contains an editorial "we" that APA 4.17 says to avoid?
Question 3
What's the best revision of: "We all know that toddlers struggle with sharing"?